翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Reynolds School District (Pennsylvania) ・ Reynolds Secondary School ・ Reynolds Securities ・ Reynolds Shultz ・ Reynolds Stone ・ Reynolds Store, Virginia ・ Reynolds Strait ・ Reynolds stress ・ Reynolds stress equation model ・ Reynolds syndrome ・ Reynolds Township ・ Reynolds Township, Lee County, Illinois ・ Reynolds Township, Michigan ・ Reynolds Township, Todd County, Minnesota ・ Reynolds transport theorem ・ Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ・ Reynolds v. Pegler ・ Reynolds v. Sims ・ Reynolds v. United States ・ Reynolds View ・ Reynolds Webb ・ Reynolds Wolf ・ Reynolds Yater ・ Reynolds' pentad ・ Reynolds, California ・ Reynolds, Georgia ・ Reynolds, Idaho ・ Reynolds, Illinois ・ Reynolds, Indiana ・ Reynolds, Marin County, California Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd ''Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd'' was a House of Lords case in English defamation law concerning qualified privilege for publication of defamatory statements in the public interest. The case provided the Reynolds defence, which could be raised where it was clear that the journalist had a duty to publish an allegation even if it turned out to be wrong. In adjudicating on an attempted Reynolds defence a court would investigate the conduct of the journalist and the content of the publication. The subsequent case of ''Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe''〔() UKHL 44〕 affirmed the defence, which was subsequently raised successfully in several defamation proceedings.〔''Roberts v Gable'' () EWCA Civ 721〕〔''Armstrong v Times Newspapers Ltd'' () EWCA Civ 1007〕〔''Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research & Marketing (UK) Ltd'' () EWCA Civ 1634〕 The defence was abolished by s4(6) Defamation Act 2013.〔(Defamation Act 2013 (c. 26) )〕 ==Facts== Albert Reynolds had been the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of Ireland until a political crisis in 1994. ''The Times'' had published an article in Ireland to the effect that Reynolds had misled the Irish Parliament; this article was then published in the United Kingdom. However, the UK version omitted an explanation that Reynolds had given for the events, which had been printed in the original article. Reynolds brought an action for defamation. The defences of justification and fair comment were unavailable, given the factual nature of the article. Times Newspapers Ltd appealed that the defence of qualified privilege be considered; the Court of Appeal denied this. The appeal to the House of Lords was therefore on the matter of whether the defence of qualified privilege be extended to cover the mass media. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.